What kind of proof is required when disputing information on the NMLS?

When disputing information on the NMLS (Nationwide Multistate Licensing System), the requirement for proof emphasizes the need for formal documentation rather than informal or subjective evidence. This means that copies of official documents or court orders are the most appropriate form of proof. Such documents provide a clear, authoritative basis for the dispute, as they are official records that can verify the accuracy or inaccuracy of the reported information.

In cases of disputes, having official documents ensures that there is a reliable reference that can be verified by the relevant authorities. This helps maintain the integrity of the licensing process by ensuring that claims are substantiated with concrete evidence rather than hearsay or informal statements.

Other options, while they may seem helpful in a general context, do not meet the requirements for sufficiently establishing proof in an NMLS dispute. Verbal confirmations or signed statements do not provide the same level of irrefutability as official documents do, and electronic records, while useful, can lack the necessary validation that formal documentation offers.