Which of the following is an example of a person acting in a fiduciary capacity?

The concept of fiduciary capacity revolves around one party holding a legal or ethical relationship of trust with another party. In this context, the correct answer highlights a scenario where someone is inherently obligated to act in the best interests of another, typically under the authority of a court.

When a person acts under a court order, they are often required to make decisions that serve the interests of the parties involved, which exemplifies fiduciary duty. This could include actions taken for the benefit of a minor, an incapacitated individual, or in matters related to estate management. The court’s involvement mandates a level of responsibility and trust, ensuring that the actions taken serve the best interests of those who cannot make decisions for themselves.

In contrast, other options do not inherently define fiduciary relationships. A borrower defaulting on a loan relates to a financial obligation and does not involve a relationship built on trust or loyalty. A real estate agent may have fiduciary duties, but this doesn't universally apply to all agents without specific context regarding their representation responsibilities. An independent loan officer operates in a transactional capacity, primarily focused on bringing lenders and borrowers together rather than holding a fiduciary trust. Thus, while the other scenarios may involve various forms of professional or legal engagement, they do not align